DRB DIGEST/EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
DRB DOCKET 2013-065
TIS 3 yrs, 2 months, 7 days
‘Implications | None
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY:
The applicant was discharged in late 2012 for a pattern of misconduct. The applicant received two alcohol
incidents for driving under the influence in the Spring of 2012. These actions resulted in awarded Non-Judicial
punishments, two outpatient treatments, and the denial of a 2™ chance waiver for retention in the service.
Due to the applicant’s short time in service within the first term of enlistment, and the track record of
misconduct, an Under Honorable Conditions character of service was issued.
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
The applicant was notified of the intent to discharge, and the applicant was advised of the rights to an attorney.
A statement by the applicant while objecting to discharge. No current or past rebuttals refuted the incidents
leading to the Discharge.
Propriety: Discharge was proper.
Equity: Discharge was equitable.
Final Adjudication by Assistant Commandant For Human Resources: No relief.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 033
The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 032
In early 2012, the applicant’s command initiated Discharge proceedings based on the two alcohol incidents. Furthermore, the applicant mentions no details or mitigating factors about the Felony Battery with no contest plea. Prior to epm’s final approval, the Admiral serving as the local Discharge authority fully endorsed the Discharge due to commission of a serious offense with a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 063
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. The applicant was given an Honorable Discharge and the most favorable Narrative Reason for separation. Administrative change will be made to the correct Separation Authority to COMDTINST M1000.4, Art.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 081
The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy. The General, Under Honorable Conditions discharge is equitable.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 091
In the year of 2011, the applicant had two documented alcohol incidents and received NJP for the aforementioned UCMJ Articles 92, 107 and 128. As of ALCOAST 125/10, the SPD code of JND is prescribed for individuals with two accumulated alcohol incidents. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2014 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2014 011
Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge due to a drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than a General, Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 071
The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, he was recommended for Discharge due to the drug incident. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 060
The applicant had a positive urinalysis result during a random testing in late 2012. The applicant’s had 10 years of service which afforded the right to an Administrative Separation Board (ASB) that occurred in the Spring of 2013. The Board finds no issues with propriety or equity in this case.
CG | DRB | 2013 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2013 012
The applicant’s command determined this to be a drug incident. Pursuant to policy, the applicant was processed for Discharge separation due to a drug incident. Coast Guard policy prescribes no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service for individuals separated as a result of violating the Coast Guard’s drug policy.
CG | DRB | 2012 - Discharge Review Board (DRB) | 2012 054
The applicant received punishment that was no higher than a Summary Court Martial with one guilty plea on the two charges that occurred. The applicant’s committed offense warrants no higher than an Under Honorable Conditions character of service. The General discharge was issued correctly at the time of separation in 2005.